The Endgame in Chess and
Life:
Placing a big priority on learning Chess endgames positions is futile if the player makes too many mistakes before the endgame even arrives. Most major mistakes made in a typical chess match likely come a long time before the endgame, and are far costlier than being able to execute a KRP vs. KR
endgame appropriately. Said another way, short-term tactics employed
prevent the long-term strategic theory of endgames, which comes in handy when there
are only a few pieces left on the board. Or shortly, you dig your own grave
long before you are killed.
A current “international
chess champion” believes that:
“This (Endgame) is one of the most important phases in chess, because while it’s possible to make a comeback from mistakes made in the openings and middle game, it’s almost impossible to make a comeback from mistakes made in the endgame – as they are usually the last mistake made in the game. It’s also an area where one can score a lot of points, as it’s usually one of the phases less studied by opponents.” (end quote)
It makes sense. Victory hangs in
the balance.
So what happens when you are in a position where every move
you could make causes you to lose the game (or at least significantly worsen
the position).The German word for this predicament is called “Zugzwang”. Is
this the way Custer felt at Little Big Horn, or the band playing on the
Titanic deck? Like what’s called a “Hobson’s Choice” (which is not a
choice at all, b/c the “choice” is taking what is available or nothing at all),
or being struck between a rock, and a hard place? As pressure dissolves all
good strategies, tactics end up dominating the game execution. I think back
poignantly to the mind-numbing, paralyzing horror of the patriots stuck during the
Siege of the Alamo. Full disclosure, I'm a native Texan so forgive me for starting from the Texas perspective:
- Bowie and Travis led about 200 “Texicans” in the defense of the Alamo for 13 days but eventually the invading Mexican army overwhelmed them. This happened near San Antonio TX. All good 7th grade Texans learn this in public school history. But what was it like to be there, and know the odds of defense against an insurmountable force? Did “strategy” ever enter the frantic war-room discussions or was this a suicide mission? Did the enemy “surrounded” the Fort before they knew it? At what chilling moment in this Endgame did their fate become frighteningly clear?
- On March 5, 1836, after fierce fighting, Mexican artillery stopped shelling the fort. Their defensive positions weakened so, President General Antonio López de Santa Anna planned an all-out ground attack on the garrison just before dawn on March 6, 1836. Mexican soldiers would go over the walls in waves, risking hand-to-hand combat to fully and finally kill the rebellion called the Alamo.
The Queen is lost, painted warriors appear on the ridge,
bullets fly, the band plays on…
Realizing the end is near, how feeble, exposed, and
out-of-control one must feel? Dread rises as a fever, slowly strangling
life out of the victim. A knotted gut, sweating brow, but most of all an
overriding “confusion” seeps under the door like drifting fog. How is this
actually happening? Looking at the Chess board, gulping, blinking, realizing
there aren’t many moves left, you have found yourself in the astonishing “Endgame”.
Keep up the fight, but don’t lie to yourself looking out over the precipice at a
“Check-mate” on the board; it will not go away without one. more. move. ##
©Mark H. Pillsbury
